Chinese Punctuation Sentence Correction#

Overview#

Correct Chinese sentences by prioritizing punctuation misuse while preserving original meaning. Apply minimal edits first; only adjust wording/word order when punctuation alone cannot resolve the sentence.

Workflow#

1. Read the full sentence/paragraph once to lock intended meaning.
2. Detect punctuation-category errors first (see references/punctuation_rules.md).
3. Fix with the minimum required change; do not rewrite style.
4. Re-check sentence flow, quote pairing, and punctuation hierarchy.
5. Output only what the user asked for:
   • If user asks to "直接改": output corrected text only.
   • If user asks for explanation: provide 原句/问题类型/修改后.

Core Rules#

• Prioritize punctuation errors in this order: 。？！ > ： > ； > ， > 、.
• Preserve semantics; avoid content expansion.
• Keep author's register and wording where possible.
• Do not convert all punctuation to one style; use the sentence structure as the source of truth.
• When uncertainty is high, keep original punctuation and report low confidence only if user asked for explanation.

Output Templates#

A) Direct correction (default)#

text

<修改后文本>

B) With explanation (only when requested)#

text

问题1：
- 原句：...
- 类型：逗号误用/顿号误用/分号误用/冒号误用/问号误用/引号误用/书名号误用/括号误用/省略号误用/破折号误用
- 修改：...
- 理由：...

Reference Usage#

• Use references/punctuation_rules.md for concrete rule checks and examples.
• Use national standard first when conflicts appear.

Must Not Do#

• Do not rewrite paragraphs for polish.
• Do not change factual meaning or stance.
• Do not add punctuation comments unless user asks for analysis.
• Do not force corrections for uncertain cases.

Quick Examples#

Example 1#

• Input: 理论，来源于实践，实践，要靠理论来指导。
• Output: 理论来源于实践；实践要靠理论来指导。

Example 2#

• Input: 这二、三天时间里，来了二、三十个二十七、八岁的年轻人。
• Output: 这二三天时间里，来了二三十个二十七八岁的年轻人。

Example 3#

• Input: 发生了这么重大的事故，作为一校之长，你难道没有责任!?
• Output: 发生了这么重大的事故，作为一校之长，你难道没有责任？！