Multi-platform content trend aggregation and analysis, producing data-driven article outlines and content strategies. Triggers when users need: content trend analysis, topic heat tracking, trending topic discovery, user intent analysis, content gap mining, competitive content research, SEO keyword trends, data-driven article outline generation, content strategy formulation.
Trend analysis, content trends, trending topics, trend analysis, content gap, topic analysis, topic selection, content strategy, outline generation, content outline.
Confirm with the user (if not explicitly provided):
Collect data in layers by priority, using the corresponding tool for each layer:
PlatformToolContent CollectedGoogle Trendsweb_fetch trends.google.comSearch heat trends, related queries, geographic distributionRedditweb_search site:reddit.comPopular discussions, highly upvoted answers, community pain pointsYouTubeweb_search site:youtube.comVideo popularity, comment sentiment, title keywords
PlatformToolContent CollectedMedium/Substackweb_search site:medium.com OR site:substack.comLong-form topic selection, subscriber interaction, writing stylesTwitter/Xweb_search site:x.comReal-time discussions, hashtags, KOL perspectivesZhihu/Weiboweb_search site:zhihu.com OR site:weibo.comChinese community Q&A, trending topicsBaidu Indexweb_fetch index.baidu.comChinese search trends, audience profilesProduct Huntweb_search site:producthunt.comNew product trends, technology directions
PlatformToolContent CollectedCompetitor Blogs/Official Accountsweb_fetch + web_searchExisting content coverage, publishing frequency, engagement dataGitHub Trendingweb_search site:github.com/trendingDeveloper technology trends
Collection Strategy:
"{domain} + {time-related term}", "{domain} + pain point term", "{domain} + how/why/what"Perform the following analysis on the collected data:
Topic Clustering: Group similar topics; identify 3-5 core themes
Intent Classification:
Sentiment Tendency: Positive/Negative/Neutral; identify controversial topics
User Personas: Infer technical level and role identity from discussion language
Compare existing content with user needs:
text
Existing Content Coverage Matrix:
Topic A: ████░░░░ 50% (Lacks advanced content)
Topic B: ██░░░░░░ 25% (Significant gaps)
Topic C: ████████ 90% (Saturated; difficult to differentiate)
Topic D: ░░░░░░░░ 0% (Blue ocean opportunity)
Scoring Dimensions:
See references/outline-templates.md for output format.
Generate for each high-scoring topic:
text
## [Topic Title]
- Recommendation Score: X.X/5.0
- Target Platform: [Platform]
- Estimated Word Count: [Word Count]
- Difficulty: [Beginner/Intermediate/Expert]
### Core Value Proposition
[One sentence explaining what the reader will gain]
### Outline
1. [Introduction hook - based on real user pain points]
- Data Support: [Cite trend data]
2. [Core Argument 1]
- Sub-points + Examples/Data
3. [Core Argument 2]
- Sub-points + Examples/Data
4. [Core Argument 3]
- Sub-points + Examples/Data
5. [Conclusion + Call to Action]
### SEO Recommendations
- Primary Keyword: [Keyword]
- Long-Tail Keywords: [KW1], [KW2], [KW3]
- Title Alternatives: [Alt Title 1], [Alt Title 2]
Generate a comparison table of all candidate topics:
text
| Rank | Topic | Rec. Score | Demand Intensity | Content Gap | Differentiation | Timeliness |
|------|-------|-----------|-----------------|-------------|----------------|------------|
| 1 | ... | 4.5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 |