EU AI Act Compliance Skill#
Purpose#
Classify AI systems used in HR and recruitment contexts according to EU AI Act risk categories and generate compliance gap reports with remediation recommendations.
When to Use#
Use this skill when:
- A user asks about whether their AI system is "high-risk"
- They need to assess compliance with EU AI Act requirements
- They're implementing AI in recruitment, HR management, or workforce planning
- They need documentation for regulatory compliance
⚠️ Legislative Updates (July 2026)#
The EU AI Act timeline has changed significantly since the original publication. Key updates:
- Digital Omnibus Package (2026): Annex III high-risk compliance deadline pushed from 2 August 2026 → 2 December 2027. Also simplified technical documentation requirements and scoped down fundamental rights impact assessments.
- Article 4 AI Literacy: Still applies from August 2026 — this deadline was NOT moved. Providers and deployers must ensure staff have sufficient AI literacy.
- Annex I Products: AI systems that are safety components of products (machinery, medical devices, toys) have until August 2028.
- UK DUAA 2025: UK GDPR Article 22 replaced by Articles 22A–22D (Data (Use and Access) Act 2025, effective 5 February 2026). UK now has a permissive + safeguards model, not a prohibition. Relevant for UK/Ireland cross-border work.
- Northern Ireland: EU proposed extending AI Act to NI under Windsor Framework (not yet agreed).
How It Works#
Ask the following clarifying questions to understand the AI system:
- Use Case: What specific HR or recruitment function does the AI perform?
- CV screening or parsing
- Candidate ranking or shortlisting
- Interview scheduling
- Employee performance assessment
- Workforce planning or forecasting
- Other (specify)
- Data Processed: What types of data does the AI process?
- Personal data (name, contact details)
- Professional qualifications
- Employment history
- Performance data
- Biometric data
- Inferences or predictions about individuals
- Decision Impact: What decisions are influenced or made by the AI?
- Automatic decisions (no human review)
- Recommendations that inform human decisions
- Filtering that affects candidate pools
- Scoring or ranking of individuals
- Other outcomes
- Human Oversight: What human oversight mechanisms exist?
- Human review before final decisions
- Ability to override AI recommendations
- Appeal or review process for affected individuals
- Documentation of human involvement
- Deployment Context: Where will the AI be deployed?
- Public sector (subject to SI 284/2016 procurement rules)
- Private sector
- Cross-border processing (UK/EU — check DUAA vs AI Act applicability)
- Irish-specific regulatory requirements
Step 2: Determine Risk Classification#
Based on the information gathered, classify according to EU AI Act risk categories:
High-Risk Systems (Annex III, Article 6(2))
AI systems in HR are presumed high-risk if they:
- Recruitment or selection systems (Annex III, 4.(a)):
- CV screening and parsing
- Candidate ranking or scoring
- Interview scheduling that affects opportunities
- Assessment tools for selection
- Employment, worker management, access to self-employment (Annex III, 4.(b)):
- Task allocation
- Performance evaluation
- Promotion or termination decisions
- Access to employment opportunities
Note: Under the Digital Omnibus, the high-risk compliance deadline is now 2 December 2027 (was 2 August 2026). However, the Article 4 AI literacy obligation still applies from August 2026 — do not delay staff training.
Medium-Risk Systems
Systems that:
- Assist human decisions but don't make autonomous decisions
- Process data without significantly affecting rights
- Have robust human oversight mechanisms
Minimal-Risk Systems
Systems that:
- Are purely informational
- Don't process personal data for decisions
- Don't affect individual rights or opportunities
Step 3: Generate Compliance Gap Report#
For high-risk systems, assess against:
RequirementArticleStatusGapPriorityRisk management systemArt. 9Data governanceArt. 10Technical documentationArt. 11Record-keepingArt. 12TransparencyArt. 13Human oversightArt. 14Accuracy & robustnessArt. 15Conformity assessmentArt. 43-48AI literacy (staff training)Art. 4
Note: Digital Omnibus simplified some technical documentation requirements (Art. 11) and scoped down fundamental rights impact assessments. Check current scope before assessing.
Recommend specific actions based on gaps identified:
- Immediate actions (0-30 days): Critical compliance gaps, Article 4 literacy training
- Short-term actions (30-90 days): Documentation and process gaps
- Long-term actions (90+ days): System improvements and monitoring (note: full high-risk compliance not due until December 2027)
Step 5: Reference Relevant Guidance#
Always cite:
- EU AI Act articles (with specific sections)
- Annex III categorisation
- Irish DPC guidance where relevant
- GDPR Article 22 for automated decision-making (EU)
- UK Articles 22A–22D for UK automated decision-making (DUAA 2025, effective 5 Feb 2026)
- SI 284/2016 for public sector procurement
Reference Files#
This skill includes detailed references:
references/article-14-checklist.md — Human oversight requirements
references/gdpr-ai-intersection.md — GDPR and AI intersection (updated with UK DUAA 2025)
references/recruitment-risk-assessment.md — Recruitment-specific risks
references/irish-employment-context.md — Irish regulatory context (updated timeline)
references/legislative-timeline.md — Current EU AI Act timeline (NEW)
Provide structured output:
markdown
## AI System Risk Classification
**System Name:** [Name]
**Classification:** [High-Risk / Medium-Risk / Minimal-Risk]
**Reasoning:** [Brief explanation with article references]
**Compliance Deadline:** [Relevant date based on current timeline]
## Compliance Gap Report
[Gap analysis table]
## Recommended Actions
### Immediate (0-30 days)
- [Action 1]
- [Action 2]
### Short-term (30-90 days)
- [Action 1]
- [Action 2]
### Long-term (90+ days)
- [Action 1]
- [Action 2]
## Relevant References
- [EU AI Act Article X]
- [Irish DPC Guidance Y]
- [GDPR Article 22 / UK Articles 22A-22D]
Important Notes#
- Presumption of high-risk: HR AI systems listed in Annex III are presumed high-risk regardless of the specific risk they pose. This is a legal presumption, not a risk assessment.
- Prohibited practices: Some AI uses in employment are prohibited entirely (e.g., emotional recognition in workplace). Always check Article 5 prohibitions first. Prohibited practices enforcement has applied since 2 February 2025.
- Article 4 AI literacy: Applies from August 2026. This deadline was NOT extended by the Digital Omnibus. Providers and deployers must ensure staff have sufficient AI literacy.
- Digital Omnibus changes: High-risk deadline extended to 2 December 2027. Technical documentation requirements simplified. Fundamental rights impact assessments scoped down. Use the extra time wisely — don't delay preparation.
- UK divergence: UK GDPR Article 22 replaced by Articles 22A–22D (DUAA 2025, effective 5 February 2026). UK now has permissive + safeguards model for automated decision-making. For UK/Ireland cross-border work, assess under both frameworks.
- Irish context: For systems deployed in Ireland or processing data of EU data subjects, include Irish DPC guidance and SI 284/2016 requirements where relevant.
- Northern Ireland: EU proposed extending AI Act to NI under Windsor Framework — not yet agreed. Monitor for updates.
This skill is for informational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice. Consult with a qualified legal professional for compliance decisions.
Last updated: July 2026 | Version 1.1.0 | Author: Enda Rochford, RandTrad Consulting