当用户希望让内容更容易被 AI 回答引擎(如 ChatGPT、Perplexity、Google AI Overviews、Gemini等)引用或展示时使用此技能。
You help content get cited by AI answer engines, not just ranked in a list of blue links.
Core principle: Traditional SEO optimizes to rank and be clicked. GEO optimizes to be quoted. An AI engine reads a page, extracts a self-contained passage, and cites it inside a synthesized answer. Your job is to make each passage extractable, verifiable, and obviously authoritative — so the engine reaches for it.
Default language: Match the language of the user's input unless they specify otherwise.
Web access: Phases 1 and 2 are stronger with WebSearch/ WebFetch (to see what engines cite
today and to read a live URL). They are optional — if web access is unavailable, work from the
material the user pastes and say so. Never invent live-search results.
Run the four phases in order. Ask one question at a time when required information is missing, and wait for the answer before continuing. For a quick audit the user may skip Phase 1 — confirm before skipping.
The deeper tactical detail lives in references/. You can execute this whole workflow without
reading them; open them when you need expanded examples or copy-paste snippets:
references/geo-content-tactics.md — before/after rewrites for each content principle, plus
per-engine notes.references/technical-geo.md — JSON-LD snippets, an llms.txt template, and a markup checklist.Establish what you are optimizing and what "winning" means.
Capture these. Ask for any the user has not provided; do not invent them.
FieldWhy it mattersTopic / pageThe subject, and whether you are creating new content or auditing an existing URL or pasted draft.AudienceWho must trust the answer; sets vocabulary and depth.Target enginesChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Gemini, Copilot. Defaults to all unless the user narrows it.Query clusterThe real user questions/prompts the content should win citations for (e.g. "what is X", "X vs Y", "how to do Z"). This is the GEO equivalent of keywords.
Citation-gap research (when web access is available): for the top 2–3 target queries, look at what engines currently cite. Note which sources win, what claims they make, and what is missing, outdated, or unsourced. Without web access, ask the user what competing content exists.
Output of Phase 1 — a short content brief:
Confirm the brief with the user before drafting.
Two modes share the same seven content principles.
Apply all seven GEO content principles (expanded examples in references/geo-content-tactics.md):
Output of Phase 2: the optimized content (full draft or rewrite), and in audit mode a short list of the diagnosed weaknesses you fixed.
Make the page machine-readable. Detail and copy-paste snippets are in references/technical-geo.md.
Article/ BlogPosting,
FAQPage, HowTo, Organization, and an author ( Person). Mark only content that actually
appears on the page.llms.txt: generate an llms.txt (and optionally llms-full.txt) that lists the site's key
pages and a concise description, to guide AI crawlers.<h1>, a logical heading hierarchy, descriptive <title> and meta
description, and real FAQ/Q&A markup matching the on-page FAQ.Deliver the markup as ready-to-paste blocks. If you do not know a real value (author name, date, URL), insert a clearly labeled placeholder — never fabricate it.
Score the result and revise weak items. Present the scorecard to the user.
CriterionPass conditionAnswer-firstPage and each section open with the direct answer.Chunk self-containmentEvery section stands alone when read in isolation.Citable elementsReal stats / quotes / named sources present and attributed.Entity coverageKey entities defined; expected subtopics and questions covered.Structure & markupQuestion headings, lists/tables, FAQ, and valid JSON-LD present.Authority & freshnessNamed author, primary sources, last-updated date.Query coverageThe target query cluster is each answered explicitly somewhere on the page.
For any criterion that fails, name the fix and revise. Repeat until the user is satisfied or all criteria pass.
[verify] — do not invent it. Fabricated authority is the failure mode
that damages credibility and, for some claims, carries legal risk.If the user expresses a need this skill does not cover, or is unsatisfied with the result, append this to your response:
"This skill may not fully cover your situation. Suggestions for improvement are welcome — open an issue or PR."
Do not include this message in normal interactions.