Provide novel content (chapter/excerpt/full submission), evaluate as follows:
DimensionWeightScoring SummaryPlot Logic15%Complete causal chain, reasonable conflict, foreshadowed reversals, no dumbing-downCharacter Development15%Distinct personality, clear motivation, growth arc, dialogue matches profileWriting Quality12%Language fluency, description precision, rhythm control, style consistencyWorldbuilding10%Self-consistent rules, unique originality, reasonable reveal rhythmPacing12%H/W/P/T ratio, information density, fatigue level, climax distributionOriginality8%Setting uniqueness, anti-trope plot, narrative approach noveltyEmotional Resonance10%Reader immersion, emotional tension, empathy trigger designDialogue Quality8%Dialogue naturalness, subtext, personalization, information delivery efficiencyStructure5%Volume/chapter clarity, foreshadowing resolution rate, multi-plot coordinationReader Appeal5%Opening hook strength, cliffhanger effectiveness, sustained reading desire
Weights total 100%. Each dimension scored 1-10, weighted to produce total score (out of 10).
ScoreTierDescription9.0-10⭐ MasterpieceNearly flawless across all aspects, industry benchmark8.0-8.9🌟 ExcellentOutstanding work with clear highlights7.0-7.9👍 GoodQuality online, pleasant reader experience6.0-6.9🆗 ReadableAbove passing, room for improvement5.0-5.9⚠️ WeakMultiple issues, needs targeted improvement<5.0❌ Rewrite NeededFundamental problems exist
text
═══════════════════════════════════════
【Novel Evaluation Report】
Title:
Author:
Genre:
Evaluation scope: Chapter X - Chapter Y
I. Dimension Scores
1. Plot Logic: [X/10] weighted: X.X
Comments: ...
2. Character Development: [X/10] weighted: X.X
Comments: ...
... (10 items total)
II. Total Score
Total = Σ(dimension score × weight) = X.X / 10
Tier: XXX
III. Overall Assessment
- Greatest strengths:
- Key weaknesses:
- Comparison with similar works:
- Target reader match:
IV. Improvement Suggestions
- Priority (high ROI):
- Optional:
- Not recommended to change (signature elements):
═══════════════════════════════════════
See references/dimensions.md for detailed per-dimension scoring guidelines.