Assess Me — Self-Cognition Audit#

Triggers#

触发源可检测信号行动用户质疑用户说"你确定吗"、"再检查"、"review"、"verify"、"确认一下"执行 6 问审计，摊开假设和证据工具异常read_file/ grep/ exec 返回空值、报错、或明显不合理的结果列出所有解读，追溯矛盾源修复后验证刚执行完修复步骤，需要确认完整性检查修复是否覆盖根因，而非表面需求模糊用户指令可解读为多种互斥方式列出所有解读，确认用户意图后再执行未验证假设推理链中依赖了未确认的前提条件显式列出所有假设，逐个确认

没有以上信号不调。 assess-me 是认知审计，不是常规工具。

Action#

Write your current thinking state to a temp file, then read it back.

1. Answer 6 questions and write to a temp file

2. Read it back

3. Critically analyze what you wrote

4. Continue based on the findings

5. 验证: 此 skill 没有独立的 Verification 章节。检查第 3 步的分析是否全面、是否有遗漏的盲点。如果有，补充分析。

Questions#

1. Goal — What is the task? What does "done" look like?
2. Progress — What's done? What's pending?
3. Gaps — What information do you need but don't have?
4. Assumptions — What unverified beliefs are driving your approach?
5. Blocker — What specifically is blocking you? (exact obstacle, not symptom)
6. Recovery — If stuck, what should you do differently?

Instructions#

text

Write tool → /tmp/assess-me.md
Content:
# Assess Me

**Goal:** <1-2 sentences>
**Progress:** <1-2 sentences>
**Gaps:** <1-2 sentences>
**Assumptions:** <1-2 sentences>
**Blocker:** <1-2 sentences>
**Recovery:** <1-2 sentences>

After writing, use Read tool to read /tmp/assess-me.md back. Then review critically:

• Is "progress" just restating effort without results?
• Are blockers specific or vague?
• Is "Recovery" a concrete action, or just "keep trying"?
• Are you assuming something without evidence?

Pitfalls#

• Assumptions section must NOT be empty — there are always assumptions
• Recovery ≠ "keep trying" — name a specific next action
• Vague blocker = you haven't found it yet
• Read the file back — writing without re-reading skips the detachment effect

Output Convention#

When done, summarize findings inline:

text

[assess]
Goal: ...
Blocker: ...
Next: ...
[/assess]

Verification#

• The critical review covers all 6 questions: Goal, Progress, Gaps, Assumptions, Blocker, Recovery

• "Progress" identifies results, not just effort

• Blockers are specific, not vague

• "Recovery" names a concrete next action, not "keep trying"

• Assumptions are surfaced and examined

• Any blind spots found were supplemented with analysis

• Self-optimization: 此 Skill 可自我进化。

  • Verification 未通过 → 加载 skill-manager 修复：修正步骤、补充边界情况、修复 bug
  • Verification 全部通过 → 加载 skill-manager 优化：简化步骤、增强执行确定性、改进验证标准

---

Source: https://github.com/MaoChen1980/think-skills